

YuJa Panorama provides advanced analytics and reporting dashboards that can inform decisions and show an institution’s accessibility journey over time.
YuJa Panorama provides an advanced analytics and Content Report dashboard that can inform decisions and encourage the creation of accessible content. Administrators and instructors can quickly see the accessibility of their courses and how accessibility has changed over time, how students are interacting with content, and identify gaps in their accessibility journey.
In the course report, instructors can view an overall course accessibility score as well as file-by-file accessibility scores and track progress over time. Files with low accessibility scores can be quickly replaced with new versions.
Using YuJa Panorama, Pamlico Community College has scanned more than 11,000 files. In addition, over 1,000 alternative formats have been downloaded. In the first quarter of 2023, the institution increased its overall accessibility by 6% over the previous quarter.
Read the case studyAdministrators can get a snapshot of the institution’s courses, including data on which courses are most and least accessible, monthly and term-over-term comparisons, and overall accessibility issues, as well as track their accessibility journey over time.
The issues report shows Administrators the most common accessibility issues across the institution. View the average number of issues per document, total issues by severity, and download reports to help prioritize and address accessibility concerns.
Administrators and instructors can gain transparency into how their accessibility scores are calculated based on tests performed and issues identified. These insights allow instructors to see how issues affect their overall score, prioritize action to enhance accessibility, and more with a detailed breakdown of their score.
Institutional leaders can choose from a variety of scoring rubrics to determine how they want to assess document accessibility, ensuring compliance with each institution’s unique requirements and improving overall digital inclusivity. In addition to defining how each model scores accessibility issues, leaders can assess models based on how strict or lenient they are and compare models across scenarios to see how they perform.